Why the richest should contribute most.

There seems to be some consternation amongst the top earners in the UK that they would be asked by a future Labour government to pay 5% more on their earnings above £150k. This actually affects 1% of all UK earners.

Just as a matter of interest: to impose this extra 5% on earnings over £100k would affect the top 2%.

The facts about earnings distribution in the UK show that 85% of those getting a wage or salary earn less than £40k pa which equates in most cases to about £570 per week after tax.

The argument against higher tax rates for the very top earners seems to be that it punishes those who are successful, and that it would discourage wealth creators from living in the UK.

But it is not just the top 1% or 2% who create wealth. We all do in varying amounts. Everybody who works, creates some value in some way, and all those paying income tax at any level, or VAT on purchases contribute to government receipts.

All provision of infrastructure and technological advance of any kind is through funding coming either from private profits or government expenditure.

All education is supplied through the same methods of funding.

It is my contention that the higher up the tree you are in terms of earnings, the more you are benefiting from the efforts of all those below you, because the use value of existing economic/cultural/social capital enables optimization of your earnings.

If you are already earning £150k this equates in most cases to about £1,740 per week after tax.

Would it be too much to ask in this case that for every additional £10,000 per annum you earned, you paid an additional £9.61 per week in tax. You know, put a bit extra back in, just to take the pressure off the other 99% a bit in recognition of the "leg-up" they are giving you.

Freedom of Speech

There are currently many challenges to the concept of Freedom of Speech. In my opinion one of the most dangerous is the idea that criticism of religious views is in some way "off limits" because that criticism is likely to cause offence. I would like to point out that I am sometimes quite offended myself by some of these religious views, but I would not presume to want them silenced.

Under no circumstances should government attempt to limit the right to free speech in any way, based on the idea that some people might abuse that right. If there are abuses of free speech such as incitement to hatred or violence, we have laws to prosecute the offenders.

This is how free speech should work:

Free speech is a basic human right for all, not just for those who have passed some sort of value judgement, test, or filter.

Any person or organization has the right to vocalize their thoughts and opinions using whatever medium they see fit, hopefully using some reasoned argument in support of their position.

Any other person or organization then has the right to either support or criticize those thoughts and opinions in whatever way they see fit, but hopefully using some reasoned argument in support of their own position.

This process can continue as long as the participants want to pursue it, ad infinitum.

At some point there may come a synthesis of the various arguments, or the parties may have to agree to differ.

The important thing is that at the end of the process all the ideas have been tested in a public forum, and all persons who have followed the argument will be able to establish their own point of view as a result.

If the process is stopped at an early stage because one of the parties is offended and adopts special pleading instead of engaging in the process of debate, we cannot reach that point.

I would suggest that those who will not submit to, or will not allow, full and open debate use diversionary tactics because they know that their argument is weak and they will be unlikely to press their case successfully.

"Desired Things"

Go placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence. As far as possible without surrender be on good terms with all persons. Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others, even the dull and the ignorant; they too have their story. Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are vexations to the spirit. If you compare yourself with others, you may become vain and bitter; for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself. Enjoy your achievements as well as your plans. Keep interested in your own career, however humble; it is a real possession in the changing fortunes of time. Exercise caution in your business affairs; for the world is full of trickery. But let this not blind you to what virtue there is; many persons strive for high ideals; and everywhere life is full of heroism. Be yourself. Especially, do not feign affection. Neither be cynical about love; for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment it is as perennial as the grass. Take kindly the counsel of the years, gracefully surrendering the things of youth. Nurture strength of spirit to shield you in sudden misfortune. But do not distress yourself with dark imaginings. Many fears are born of fatigue and loneliness. Beyond a wholesome discipline, be gentle with yourself. You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here. And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should. Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be, and whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul. With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be cheerful. Strive to be happy.

“

”

Max Ehrmann, "Desiderata".^[

Words of Wisdom

“Imagine a world in which generations of human beings come to believe that
certain films were made by God or that specific software was coded by him.
Imagine a future in which millions of our descendants murder each other
over rival interpretations of Star Wars or Windows 98. Could anything --
anything -- be more ridiculous? And yet, this would be no more ridiculous
than the world we are living in. ”
- Sam Harris  

Ten Ideas Not Cast In Stone (Inspired by "Sunscreen")

• Knowledge is a process. That is the first thing you need to know. It is a lifelong endeavour and should be constantly checked for relevance. If the world changes and your ideas don't you will get left behind. "Stay hungry, stay foolish".
• Be open to all ideas no matter where they come from, but be wary of those ideas whose proponents demand a protected or privileged position. Truth will stand up to any amount of criticism, debate and ridicule without special protection.
• It is important to have your own reasons for what you believe to be true, but there is nothing wrong with consensus. Neither is there anything wrong with intuition so long as you recognise it as such.
• It will serve you well to be sympathetic to ideas held by others, even those which you perceive to be mistaken. The route by which they have arrived at them is informed by different experiences to your own.
• Take at least some time to study a little formal Logic. You will be amazed at how soon you you find yourself using it to determine the strength, (or otherwise), of people's arguments.
• Try to understand people's motives. It gives an extra dimension to what they say and do. Likewise be critical of your own motives.
• Strive to keep a balance in your life between Competition and Co-operation. Too much of either will weaken you.
• You will do well to recognise the fundamental importance of free speech. The free, open and frank exchange of ideas in a public forum is vital for the moral wellbeing of any society. All ideas have equal validity, although not equal truth, relevance or usefulness. Any attempt to control the input of ideas into the process will result in a skewed outcome.
• Treat every person you meet as your exact equal. To do anything other than this is to belittle either them or yourself.
• Beware pedants who use bullet points.

Global Inequalities.

We are 7 billion people on this planet. There are 1.4 billion people officially classed as obese. There are an estimated 1 billion who go to bed hungry every night. How many more centuries will it be until we as a species manage to solve this most basic of dilemmas; to ensure that we all have our minimum nutritional needs met?

War - what is it good for?

“If we really saw war, what war does to young minds and bodies, it would be impossible to embrace the myth of war. If we had to stand over the mangled corpses of schoolchildren killed in Afghanistan and listen to the wails of their parents, we would not be able to repeat clichés we use to justify war. This is why war is carefully sanitized. This is why we are given war's perverse and dark thrill but are spared from seeing war's consequences. The mythic visions of war keep it heroic and entertaining…

The wounded, the crippled, and the dead are, in this great charade, swiftly carted offstage. They are war's refuse. We do not see them. We do not hear them. They are doomed, like wandering spirits, to float around the edges of our consciousness, ignored, even reviled. The message they tell is too painful for us to hear. We prefer to celebrate ourselves and our nation by imbibing the myths of glory, honor, patriotism, and heroism, words that in combat become empty and meaningless.”

― Chris Hedges, Death of the Liberal Class